The House of Representatives has advanced the SPEED Act, a sweeping reform of the federal environmental review process, despite last-minute modifications sparking concern among clean energy advocates and moderate Democrats. These changes caused some supporters to withdraw their backing, highlighting the bill’s contentious nature.

The legislation, known as the Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development Act, aims to streamline permitting procedures—potentially accelerating infrastructure and energy projects. Introduced by Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-Arkansas) and supported by Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine), the bill narrowly passed with a 221-196 vote. Notably, 11 Democrats sided with Republicans, reflecting divided opinions within the party.

Critics argue that the bill undermines established environmental protections, risking harm to natural landscapes and communities. Environmental groups warn that rapid approval processes could bypass thorough environmental assessments, leading to long-term ecological damage.

Now heading to the Senate, the SPEED Act faces a mixed reception. Experts suggest its future depends on bipartisan negotiations, as supporters emphasize economic growth, while opponents stress environmental safeguards. The debate underscores the ongoing tension between infrastructure development and environmental conservation in U.S. policy.

David Nield

Dave is a freelance tech journalist with over 20 years covering gadgets, apps, and the web. From Stockport, England, he covers news, features, and reviews for TechRadar, focusing on phones, tablets, and wearables. He ensures top weekend breaking news and has bylines at Gizmodo, T3, PopSci, and others. He edited PC Explorer and The Hardware Handbook for years. Read me on x.com or linkedin.